🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned decision, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to employ a revised congressional map that is projected to include several five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a district court's ruling that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disrupting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to employ the maps created after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

With a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

This decision is part of a nationwide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican control. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

Conversely, Democratic representatives decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A senior House leader stated the court had yet again shredded its legitimacy by approving a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.